Most Innovative Companies of 2010

Top 25 Most Innovative Companies

Political Lobbyist Spending

Latin America GDP Analysis II

Point of emphasis: Secular - Rational does not mean a non-belief in God! Also note the Economic Development relationship with Traditional Values once beyond survival values.

2.20.2011: *Updated comparison graphic to remove calculation rounding and spreadsheet intrusion influence.

Definitions III

context - noun
1. The parts of a written or spoken statement that precede or follow a specific word or passage, usually influencing its meaning or effect.

2. The set of circumstances or facts that surround a particular event, situation, etc.


interpretation - noun
1. The act or process of explaining the meaning of something.

Global Economic Development: A Data Graphic Introduction

Beliefs? Systems[Methods]? Authority? Results?

Initially wanted the beginning phases of dialogue to discuss this topic while including many of the graphics I have prepared up to this point. However, after including the needed graphics, an extended introductory essay would make the post too long. Thus, follow-up posts will explain and refer to the relationships among the graphics relative to current economic experiences and associated coordinations (Ideology strategies). Including the influence of religious and biblical interpretations on societal-industry economic development; stereotypes-beliefs-legal influence probabilities; tactics to fraternal obligations using political constituencies / institutions for advantage; resource ownership financing benefits resulting from economic leadership; and the need for reinforced constitutional legal protections against U.S. conservative mystic fraternal intelligence "family" religion economic system genome (s)exploitations orchestrated to create a special operations pronoun narrative for pre-defined demographic solidarity commitments [or development of the argument removing ethnic-based "family" restrictions/obligations on mutually-agreed emotionally healthy, non-exploitive relationships](re: Personal Evidentiary Theory and Relativity Management Theory XX and XY blog posts).

Note: Preferences based upon a statistical sample of population responses (non-significant R²).

U.S. based Development Metric is 1.00, the 0.96 avg reflected in the statistical analysis is a result of non-reconciliation of state population data variability to total population.

Theoretical humankind Influences - How it could conceivably happen

1.   Roswell [timing, timeline]

2.   Military hierarchy infiltration

3.   Intelligence Organizations / Fraternal (secrets) "agreements" - (J.E. Hoover)

4.   Technology / Corporations / investment [military spending history]

5.   Political infiltration / Elections [morality focus / leverage]

6.   Conservative Ideology & Church [worship/ financing/ Coptic - Mystic abilities?]

7.   Relationship Privacy Protection fraternal "royalty" fee? [morality?]

8.   Legislative branches of government [banking industry?]

9.   Medical - Science research - education institutions (information collection)

10. Human Genome / DNA studies control / stereotypes & procreation exploitation?

11. Executive influence ["NWO" --> Faith politics --> Change? (banking crisis?)]

12. Intelligence Special action plan (strategy) reveal? Social "fraternal" commitment? Constitutional? No!

*re: Relativity Management Theory XX and XY [Episode I]: Time - Space - Dimensions and Technology

Updated: August 26, 2016 [added video]

American Civics 2011?

Documents were intentionally not completed to facilitate discussion and thought relative to the philosophical understanding of the United States of America; inhabitants’ rights; individual freedoms and protections (from faith based special operations fraternal orchestrated infiltrated economics human right's violations). It also provides a framework to evaluate the current day activities relative to historically evolved U.S. Constitutional rights and protections for humanity. 

Civil Rights!

Human Rights!

????????

*****Disclaimer: Documents created for reflection of existing institutional functions and legal, constitutional  comparison considerations, not for consideration of complete system redesign!*****

Some Things to think about!

I must reiterate that I do not support fraternal exploitation based upon "family" traditions and do support the investigation into certain specific fraternal "mystical religion" telecommunication situational setups to exploit stereotypes (psychological conditioning narrative creation) directed toward submission to fraternal narrative commitment [initiation "family" leverage claims and U.S. Southern plan?] for a pre-planned result. Better explained in a corporate industry contracts and conservative, fraternal-church institutional faith-based legislation leverage for economic commitment discussion.

Does belief make it true, correct, or just in a Democratic, constitutional based legal system? Would not leadership that has emerged from a mystical, hierarchial “Order” system attempt to impose the same system of training? With fraternal collaboration, can narratives be created for a predetermined result if part of (protection) the belief system? Does this continuing system deliver the best ongoing results for society or developing global leadership?