Relativity Management Theory XX and XY [Episode II]: Definitions

[Update 12/22/2010]***Ordained meaning given the predetermined ability to choose to procreate and mutually agreed relationship partner choice.****

I have mentioned in a few other blog posts my understanding of human DNA compatibility  questioning the motives behind the social pressures to segregate along ethnic lines. There are cultural differences of which many in the population embrace and adapt. However, the basis supporting the ethnic based social design is seen in the organizational religious structures since US origin.

The United States Constitution establishes the basis for the individual rights of humans (men and women) regarding religion and all other facets of life including the rights of choice. Ideology based in fraternal belonging and "order" has tried to overpower the individual freedoms and collective interests of American citizens with "family" concepts. However defined, the "family" concept essentially attempts to transfer choice and authority away from the individual toward a determined leader with a basis that has generally been ethnic identity. This ideology would reinforce social segmentation and also allow exploitation justification in the name of fallibility subjugating society to "family" leader(s). Meaning that the "family" leaders would also be responsible for the exploitation of women and children to maintain power and authority. If this leadership is religion based, then the "family" religion is contributing to the sexploitation morality and targeted forced procreation violating all protection and value preservation of humanity ordained predetermined choice to women. Furthermore, this overly focused attention on sex morality would lead to an irrational justification violating mutually agreed free choice, relationships, and privacy.

Where are your political-fraternal-church offerings going and are they used by the "family" to maintain "order"? [Personal Note] I am a heterosexual male; do not have any children; not part of nor have interest in any organized American Greek fraternal association; and do not worship in a religion that supports such human exploitation in the name of infiltrated  "family" unity, power as proof, and literal biblical interpretations to control [religious tests for information - fraternal rites of commitment]. Such unchecked authority allows infringement of the innocent with actions not otherwise responsible. Theoretically, this situation probability is evident in the multiple fraternal structures of U.S. church worship with Masonic, Greek fraternal, and other clan associations to maintain a "traditional" society. So, to which group would elected officials have loyalty? Political representative oaths are to uphold the U.S. Constitution and all the protections guaranteed to American citizens and humanity. Are there other deals using religion and "family" identity commitment(s) - [human and humankind]? Can a person represent the U.S. Government if they do not believe in Constitutional rights of the individual?

Hypothetically, the historical practice of religious traditions are designed to support a social order of which allows manipulation resulting from the authority structure. Certain organized religious designs have been conditioned to intentional situations of falter, submission to authority, and then obligation from reward as a result of the submission. A literal interpretation of human and humankind could recognize a difference in abilities not necessarily associated with ethnic identity. However, it would confirm other existences (God, angels, universal life, astrology, etc..) beyond earth relative to scientific understanding for those that believe in such explanations. Within this hypothetical, the procreation exploitation is evident as an opportunity to introduce, expand, and evolve humankind within the society. It would also support dysfunction relative to the establishment of healthy, free choice relationships of commitment while promoting conflict within demographic competition in pursuit to control the Human Genome. Literal interpretations can be speciously used to benefit certain deceptive agendas if there are no checks and balances in interpretation. Focus on a common ethnic identity does not change issues of resource allocation, access, and basic standards of living for humanity. Stereotypes are another attempt to justify actions and to maintain psychological "order." 

I will expand upon this explanation and reasoning in a future post regarding the evolution of civilizations and economic development of Earth based partly on information in the Ancient Alien (season 1) history channel DVD relevant to real and hypothetical explanations of applicable social systems; mainly, career achievements through training and immersion of the fraternal "order" ideology. Is "family" leadership ideology assumed in the Christian church African traditions? Could this be the philosophical basis to orchestrate parings relative to the traditional skin color biases using human genome knowledge?

Related Definitions:

pol·i·tics – noun 

1) the science or art of political government.

2) the practice or profession of conducting political affairs.

5) political principles or opinions.
6) use of intrigue or strategy in obtaining any position of power or control.

or·ches·trate -- verb, -trat·ed, -trat·ing.

2) To arrange or manipulate, esp. by means of clever or thorough planning or maneuvering.

a·gen·cy –  (ā’ jən  sē), n., pl. –cies.

1) An organization, company or bureau that provides some service for another. 

2) A company having a franchise to represent another.

3) A governmental bureau, or an office that represents it.

4) The place of business of an agent.

8) The relationship between a principal and his or her agent.

9) The state of being in action or of exerting power; operation.

10) A means of exerting power or influence; instrumentality.

False dilemma

The logical fallacy of false dilemma (also called the either-or fallacy) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options. When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice.

Free Choice, Commitment, and Due Process

In a free democratic society, individuals have rights guaranteed by law along with their preferred religious practices governing how people live their lives. Much is made in America regarding race and relationships and it gets a great deal of attention. So much that fraternal agreements and understandings regulate initiation rituals to reinforce separation. During the creation of American society, recognition of some humans as property was allowed and through enlightenment and years of legal evolution the framework was amended to grant freedoms to all. Given this development, how could any ethnic group claim ownership or violation of property rights with an interracial relationship? Even further to the point within a given racial or ethnic group? Not even the heavily referred Bible recognizes adultery without a prior marriage commitment. Neither the constitution nor the Bible identifies these relations as violating the law. Any attempts to carry out punishment or restriction are themselves liable improper judgments. Trying to keep separate 300 million people is just not practical nor socially & economically desirable. Neither is the idea of genetically re-engineering an American Black race.

My experience has revealed that the admittance of liability or wrongdoing is very hard to achieve from some groups or people. Primarily, the accused or guilty party tries to mitigate the financial punishment for such actions without establishing a legal precedent. Regarding relationships, I look for compatible personalities, matching of values and goals, and partnership more than I do race or ethnicity. I do not regard matching within your own ethnicity nor pre-arranged relationships as a personal responsibility which contradicts the values I embrace as American. History is important but not determinant. There are many groups in society that make “racial solidarity” their cause and path toward success. However, separation solidarity is neither the American history lesson nor the direction of a progressing democratic society. Choices are made when people are comfortable understanding the agreement with some future predictability of the outcome. There are common interests within ethnic groups and they do not limit choices and freedoms. Community commitment and free choice are not mutually exclusive ideals.

The use of fraternal, religious organizations to create career liabilities and family hardships for anyone that does not conform to someone’s ethnic definition is a liability increasing social costs burdening the state. It limits earning potential (tax revenues to government), committed family development, and reinforces ethnic stereotypes. An even greater threat to the democracy is the delay of due process to protect the organized, fraternal violations of law in an attempt to replace with a subjugated group belonging. So, does the American democratic experiment continue to grow or do we fall victim to the separate, (prophetic) group commitments creating its own rules difficult to globally enforce and adjudicate within the legal system of equal justice?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
update: December 2013