Website Translator

May 17, 2016

Relativity of Political "Culture Economics"




Previous discussions inferred to the distribution aspects of culture economics and this document presentation reflects the discussion more directly using the same 2010 - 2011 business phases analysis where market capitalization of the same companies within the conceptual business phases arrangement as operating income is used. The basic analysis lends itself for updates with 2016 performance figures and will undoubtedly reveal similar if not the same summary conclusions. The market values for the companies within distribution of each industry averages lower capitalization than companies within each of the other business phases; however, distribution achieves comparable operating performance figures [lower priced equity for the same or comparable market performance]. Culture attempts to control the distribution of wealth using a morality philosophy to accumulate benefits measured by financial capital for the management of manufacturing (reproduction relationships). 

Evident by the Comparable Business System Competitive Analysis, some industry business models include distribution as part of manufacturing systems. Others have the impact of distribution in financial capital profitability. An example would be the cost of maintaining the interstate highway system is separate from the cost of manufacturing automobiles; but, is a factor in the price / cost of consumer automobile ownership. Another would be separating the business of generating electricity from the cost of maintaining the grid infrastructure leading to economic constraints to manage infrastructure maintenance. Social equivalency attempts to distribute financial capital economics using a political morality definition among the population for wealth accumulations while conducting nationalist "geneticide" programs to justify ideology and reducing human capital, social value [human value, social capital].



Regional History (as explained by wikipedia) of French, British, Spanish, Confederacy, and The United States 


The European settlement of Mobile, then known as Fort Louis de la Louisiane, started in 1702, at Twenty-seven Mile Bluff on the Mobile River, as the first capital of the French colony of Louisiana. It was founded by French Canadian brothers Pierre Le Moyne d'Iberville and Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, Sieur de Bienville, to establish control over France's Louisiana claims. Bienville was made governor of French Louisiana in 1701. Mobile's Roman Catholic parish was established on July 20, 1703, by Jean-Baptiste de la Croix de Chevrières de Saint-VallierBishop of Quebec.[24] The parish was the first established on the Gulf Coast of the United States.[24] In 1704 the ship Pélican delivered 23 French women to the colony; passengers had contracted yellow fever at a stop in Havana.[25] Though most of the "Pélican girls" recovered, numerous colonists and neighboring Native Americans died from the illness.[25] This early period was also the occasion of the arrival of the first African slaves, transported aboard a French supply ship from Saint-Dominguein the Caribbean.[25] The population of the colony fluctuated over the next few years, growing to 279 persons by 1708, yet descending to 178 persons two years later due to disease.[24]

These additional outbreaks of disease and a series of floods caused Bienville to order the town relocated several miles downriver to its present location at the confluence of the Mobile River and Mobile Bay in 1711.[26] A new earth and palisade Fort Louis was constructed at the new site during this time.[27] By 1712, when Antoine Crozat took over administration of the colony by royal appointment, its population reached 400 persons. The capital of La Louisiane was moved to Biloxi in 1720,[27] leaving Mobile in the role of military and trading center. In 1723 the construction of a new brick fort with a stone foundation began[27] and it was renamed Fort Condé in honor of Louis Henri, Duc de Bourbon and prince of Condé.[28]

In 1763, the Treaty of Paris was signed, ending the Seven Years' War, which Britain won, defeating France. By this treaty, France ceded its territories east of the Mississippi River to Britain. This area was made a part of the expanded British West Florida colony.[29] The British changed the name of Fort Condé to Fort Charlotte, after Charlotte of Mecklenburg-StrelitzKing George III's queen.[30] 

While the British were dealing with their rebellious colonists along the Atlantic coast, the Spanish entered the war as an ally of France in 1779. They took the opportunity to order Bernardo de Galvez, Governor of Louisiana, on an expedition east to retake Florida.[34] He captured Mobile during the Battle of Fort Charlotte in 1780, as part of this campaign. The Spanish wished to eliminate any British threat to their Louisiana colony, which they had received from France in the 1763 Treaty of Paris.[33] Their actions were condoned by the revolting American colonies, partially evidenced by the presence of Oliver Pollack, representative of the American Continental Congress. Due strong trade ties, many residents of Mobile and West Florida remained loyal to the British Crown.[33][34] The fort was renamed Fortaleza Carlota, with the Spanish holding Mobile as a part of Spanish West Florida until 1813, when it was seized by United States General James Wilkinson during the War of 1812.[35]The British were eager not to lose any useful inhabitants and promised religious tolerance to the French colonists; ultimately 112 French Mobilians remained in the colony.[31] The first permanent Jewish presence in Mobile began in 1763 as a result of the new religious tolerance. Jews had not been allowed to officially reside in colonial French Louisiana due to the Code Noir, a decree passed by France's King Louis XIV in 1685 that forbade the exercise of any religion other than Roman Catholicism, and ordered all Jews out of France's colonies. Most of these colonial-era Jews in Mobile were merchants and traders from Sephardic Jewish communities in Savannah and Charleston; and they added to the commercial development of Mobile[32] ... [31] During the American Revolutionary War, West Florida and Mobile became a refuge for loyalists fleeing the other colonies.[33]



April 18, 2016

Interesting Approach to Global Crude Costs



An interesting graphic article on hydrocarbon production costs internationally.



Links:
http://graphics.wsj.com/oil-barrel-breakdown/
http://graphics.wsj.com/oil-producers-break-even-prices/

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-supreme-court/1109048.html

update: June 16,2016



Offshore Drilling


April 10, 2016

Political "Culture Economics" Impact on Principles of Capital [cont.(1)]

Planetary Resources, Wealth Accumulations
 

 Understanding the basic premise requires the recognition of relationships among the comparative business system within each industry and the ethnic politics for wealth equity and labor relative to the planetary resources supporting the global economic systems' financial capital; Additionally, the dependence of tax revenues for industry distribution infrastructure. Cultural influences on the social and the economic tended to emphasize financial capital creating governance vulnerabilities from obsessive governance of human relationships. Primarily driven by reproduction politics culture for "capitalism" of human capital wealth accumulations from family economic philosophy which does not cover the cost of business economics development phases consistent with human capital, social value [human value, social capital].



Political "Culture Economics" Impact on Principles of Capital [cont.(2)]



Morality exploitations social governance mgt [Nationalist ideologies]
Secondarily in discussion to Planetary Resources Wealth Accumulation are the roles of governance institutions and impact on capital; particularly, human capital. Cultural arguments tend to get reflected within regional histories of economic development including ethnic politics and gender economics. Primary to economic development is Idea Development, Resource Acquisition within a system of protection for intellectual property as well as other commodity resources. Morality cultural impacts tend to consolidate claims within wealth equity & ownership for a unified "family" political approach to community distorting the innovation principles necessary to take place for social capital development. Thus, using financial capital to aggregate ownership claims of Idea Development, Resource Acquisition from wealth accumulations of Planetary commodity Resource developments of governance systems, which conceptually reduces IDRA to labor economics managed through morality politics of distribution economics and demography. 


Political "Culture Economics" Impact on Principles of Capital [cont.(3)]


"Geneticide" programs "family" + wealth accumulations morality strategies,
country politics and corporate economics social governance mgt. [human capital]

Evident social governance derived constructs from social cultural relativity to form a White | Black culture economic morality in an effort to maintain current demography as a constant using family institutions within a centralized regulating ideology for reproduction culture sophistry. Resulting in leveraged Human Capital Social Value [Human Value, Social Capital] into obsessive culture economic social relationship governance of human biology genealogy and genetic science justification politics.