Human Genetics and Chemical Markers

Here are a few videos that can provide the basics of understanding for human genetics, chemical markers, and the personally derived topic of "geneticide"[biological efforts to regulate human genome relationships]. Part of the genetics video uses the term "junk" to describe the uncoded DNA in the human genome; however, undiscovered coding for human DNA does not make the cells "junk." Particularly, in light of "Ancient Alien" theories of unused or undiscovered molecular coding for future human development.

Related?? - Fallible Individual Religious Design and Human Genetic Testing

In which dictionary is the "Family Values" definition? Social policy? Control? 

Which is more important: What you can physically see or what you cannot physically see? Do understanding the human genome and the ability to manipulate coincide with Acts of God?

National Institute of Health, Deoxyribonucleic [genetic/genealogy science], ["creation"? reproduction?]

Definition:

or·ches·trate -(v) 

To arrange or manipulate, esp. by means of clever or thorough planning or maneuvering.

also re: Coordinated Events Theory, Events Theory Participants, Alabama Files II, The System of Controls?

Personal Evidentiary Theory, Part I

“Family Values?” v. current (evolved) Constitutional Individual Rights, Protections, & Freedoms

The historical lessons taught to most Americans briefly focuses on early Egyptian, Greco-Roman, and European civilizations. Emphasis is placed on American history relative to the struggle for independence from the British Empire and some historical relationship of European exploration of the Americas. Unless students pursue the history in college courses or independently, little is known of the connections and evolutions among civilizations and will not notice the relevance to current life influence and experience. We marvel at the global cultural architecture and wonders of the world and should see the relevance to early American formation and development.

In earlier blog posts, I have referred to the records of early human civilizations; human and cultural evolution; and the concept of universal rights of man and existence (not a universal legal order counter to sovereignty and rights of humanity) applicable to religion, specifically Christianity. Following the historically taught paths of earthly civilizations, influence is evident in building designs;  organized municipal layouts; fraternal religious and social organizations; and disputable evolutionary paths of humanity learned from biological technology developments (DNA).  This combination of factors reveals the real commonality of humanity and the inter-relationships of many ethnicities. Also revealed is the strategic economic impact of the cumulative human racial - religious identity system for advantage. A system culminating into an American enterprise strategy used until after the major Wars. Although the country experienced many years of economic and social progress, the effect of such a system created alternative strategies relative to the values in the Declaration of Independence, the current US Constitution, and American civil laws elevating social formation of a “family values” ideology.

The definitions of family can be tailored for broad or narrow application as evident in the multiple defined listings and will reveal to some extent group social objective(s). I have been educated around various ethnic groups different than myself [Latino, Black, multi-ethnic, & White] most of my life and have been comfortable learning cultures, networking and socializing with the groups. I would also be comfortable welcoming into my definition of family. Conceptually, “family values” political strategies promote historical southern traditions built around segmented societies to preserve influence relative to concentrated resource accumulation. It fails to recognize the beneficial impact of the expanded economy upon accepted incorporation of expanded citizen civil rights legislation. The impact was an increased consumer base for the importantly recognized “small business” economic development contributions.  Aside from legal considerations, the “family” definition can limit participation and benefits. Particularly troubling with this ideological adoption is the limited distribution of acquired resources based upon global contributions. The “Family Values” recognition would now discount these contributions with exclusionary practices. Society and its current structure are based upon inclusive citizenship contribution with protections provided by legal rights reinforced and supported by the Central Government. If “family values” leaders were the principal regulators of morality, behavior, and rewards, would the judgments for all citizens reflect a consistent application? Compensation and  punitive actions for violation of individual (human) rights by seen and unseen “families” using systematic deception in an attempt to create obligation and increase the “family”? Would it recognize variability in individual understanding of the teachings of Jesus, or God of worship? “Family Values” conflict with the law and individual rights in a Constitutional Democracy.

Science has provided knowledge of human commonality although a cursory analysis of the US social structure reflects the historical past of attempted integration of separate design. Religious institutions mostly organized under the recognition of Christianity with exceptions of varying traditional philosophies created through evolved belief systems. This structure further incorporates “fraternal” organizations built around the historical commonality of beliefs and developed leadership structures of the Order concept. Application of the Order conceptual psychology is evident in municipal design layouts and also reflects the structured logic of mathematics and scientific advancements. Fraternal organizations and “family values” adoption follows this pattern without recognition of the various human personalities similarly identified in the work of Briggs, Myers, and other psychologists. The strict and literal application of the Order definition related to hierarchal ranking (particularly one based upon race) does not reflect the variety of human perspectives and personalities. Furthermore, this type of application limits personal contributions, the potential economic return on abilities, legal and social protections, and freedoms. What would a literal interpretation of human and humankind [man and mankind] reveal?

Given this brief elaboration of the “family values” and Order impacts, the appearance of unconstitutionality is evident unless individually accepted without deception of obligations and conditions. Notwithstanding is the political Oath of office upon election which requires the affirmation and support of the Constitutional basis establishing freedoms, protections, and rights of humanity. This acceptance is of such importance that it is a required incorporation of the US education system and immigrant newcomers are required to learn it as part of the naturalization process to citizenship. The Order definition people identify when using the term is to follow the accepted and system approved laws. Appropriate complexity is incurred with the levels of legal authority given the system of Federal, State, and Municipal laws and ordinances.

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Supplemental Document update][8/2014]

Average Human Height by Geographic Region & Gender

While looking through information on DNA, genetics, and origins, I saw interesting information for comparison. It was a listing on wikipedia for the average human height by gender and country. I reproduced the listing in document images below with links to the actual documents. The Nordic countries had the tallest average heights for both Male and Female genders followed by the United States. I will leave it up to each of you to do your comparisons relative to your known or unknown region of ethnic origins and ideas on human evolution.

Average Human Height by Country & Gender - [Slides]            Wikipedia - Human Height

Historical Connections? Part 2

The United States society and economy really began to distinguish itself during and after WWII. The war required change in social policy allowing the inclusion of all members of society to contribute to the build of necessary industry support. This inclusive policy also allowed Latin American immigrants to join the effort in the United States contributing to increased earnings distribution and wealth across American communities. The expansion of industry and labor (skill development) aided the economy during increased worldwide industrial demand from capacity impacted regions after the war. The quarter century or more after WWII redefined the American society from the church to the military defense build-up strategies for US interests to include all citizens and share economic prosperity.

WWII also provided the early need for integration initiatives ultimately leading to Civil Rights legislation of the 1960’s. Although serving in segregated units, the soldiers proved to be exceptional contributors to the US efforts despite fears of enemy cooptation. These fears were promoted within the conservative circles of the military contributing to the limited usage of the diverse manpower and reflected the prevailing psychology of Conservative protection ideology. Protection through the need for precise and insulated organizational structures; the new Homeland security developments; current forced adoption of order through war actions (Middle East); and an overestimated need to conserve capital resources. Many of the human projections were derived from stereotypical assessments as evidenced in the correlation among the social structure; community economic impacts; and morality definitions to preserve human ethnic identifications (DNA vulnerabilities).

Although I am briefly introducing the topic of stereotypes and impacts here, I plan a future blog post to clarify the personal assessment analysis connecting fraternal organizations and social relationships. My perspective is obviously that of a "Black" American male (w/ Native ancestry) growing as a youth in the American South during the integration policy introduction. I am relating personal observations & experiences, reading of history, and stories heard to eventual social outcomes. During that period of the 1^st generation integration, much time and energy was spent trying to prove against a critique of inability to perform [any task outside of manual labor - assumptive human capital value] ignoring the variability in relative levels and quality of education and experience of the time. The social integration resistance was supplemental to the efforts to prevent further sexual, racial interrelations by limiting the desirable mate trait appeals of intelligence and economic success. Current day impacts are the conservative emphasis of “family values” and the fallible individual morality related to sexual activity, particularly interracial. The Latino stereotype consistent with this labor social impact is the association with non-citizenship and “illegal status.” Counter to the promotion of prosperity is the moral fallibility design that is comparable to the Black church traditions/expectations to provide support and spiritual comfort for those actions deemed “short of God” by "decision makers" [with no mention of involvement, corporate influence, or Florida connections]. Moreover, the design reflects the American cultural differences with large, continental African family traditions. Given this history and traditional role, exploitation of stereotypes is consistent with activities indentified in the J. Edgar Hoover autobiography, The Man and The Secrets (ISBN-13: 9780393321289), of “political pressure” based upon documented sex lives (many stories that are not true) in files using tactics described in the 1976 Church Committee findings with relevance to current day internet technology.

Looking back at the 2006 Marriage data tables in my Gatekeepers and Modes of Incorporation and Integrative Social and Economic Systems blog posts provide at least one reason for the separatists' position (unless they are willing to admit some other human difference). Males outnumber females in the White and Latino/Hispanic racial groups by a combined 2.745 million according to census data. Black women outnumber Black males by 1.2 million encouraging further belief of the stereotypes. It appears the gender with the numerical advantage of greater mate choices tend to receive the more negative behavioral stereotype. The imbalance provides less incentive to stay committed upon discovery of deeper personality differences among mates not including social progress of equality and can impact leadership judgments in certain environments. The additional competition from others only compounds the imbalance in smaller communities. Moreover, the lack of available male mates support the dependence of non-married Black women on spiritual reliance of the church and emotional connections to its Male leadership (I give this perspective from perceptions outside the formal organization and have no intentions of changing positions or activity relative to this explanation). As with stereotypes and impacts, concept expansion of the church definition (and “God hierarchy”) will come in a future blog post. I am not sure how many others support my positions, but I do believe there are many others for varying reasons. However, my position is based upon constitutional rights, desired relationships of mutual agreement, partnership and definitely not for any fraternal (“family”) manipulative, sexually exploitative use of women.

The 1^st generation of adults to integrate U.S. society after legal changes for inclusion now views the next generation partially through the lenses of personal experiences of required compromises for career advancement and assimilation. During my youth, most of the adults within my sphere of influence developed careers within government institutions such as local and state police associations; fraternal acceptance; and military groups (Army, Air Force) where strict adherence to defined rules is the standard. Such societal strict adherence allows perpetuation of Hoover type activities. This next generation has grown up incorporating the policy of inclusion and freedoms without compromise of rights. These progressive, inclusive conditions and rights are expected within all social and corporate environments. Children are not required to accept ritual commitments of their parents particularly without full and complete explanation & understanding of the implication on expected rights and freedoms upon adulthood.

Historical Connections? Part 1

Updated 9-7-2010:More specific on free choice, mutually agree human ethnic combinations so not to be taken out of context:

Earthly, human racial & ethnic relationship combinations should not require alteration for any specific ethnic definition. Multi-ethnic class should not be re-engineered for change to create "pure" ethnic race(s). Humanity / humankind is diverse.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interpretation of the Adam and Eve biblical story, in my opinion, establishes the equal creation of the human race from the same origins. Biting the apple was symbolic of man and woman’s sexual desire (human nature). Once the “sin” has been committed and forgiven is there no more forbidden “fruit?” What humans must do is manage the desire which is done through laws, rights, and respect for humanity in addition to religion. Mutually agreed relations is how humanity procreates and also maintains the relationship connection which should not be abused or advantaged one over another. As with most religious discussions and issues, not all biblical references are supported by literal interpretations. Those wanting all literal interpretations appear to have an alternative agenda and should incorporate relevant context. Extreme measures can make your answers appear to support a literal interpretation affecting perception by the manner in which questions are posed. Even Jesus used parables to make his point requiring interpretation relevant to human understanding and experience. Historical information identified in some History Channel programs put forth several ideas on assistance to human development and society. From that information, it is easy to see that similar developments were taking place in multiple locations around the globe. Even the identification of an early map revealing information that would be impossible to ascertain even with today’s technology.

Civilizations in Egypt, Central and South America, and Europe were provided with and learned similar information regarding natural resources, the stars and solar system, and the universe [re: Pyramids, Stonehenge, Greece’s governance structure and ancient Rome’s religious developments]. This information led to human technical development, commerce, sharing of knowledge, and growth of civilizations. Social interchange became common place and reflects the very compatible evolution of human DNA. The original discovery of the cocoa plant bean (chocolate) and coffee was in South America and is consumed worldwide in many delicious fashions. The benefit of trade and commerce allows one region of the world to share products and “know-how” with the rest of the world. A literal interpretation of separation would have never allowed social human development. God has allowed humans such growth abilities and knowledge to evolve and what God has allowed should not be separated. Humans were created in God’s image. We are taught that Jesus was sent for “man’s” sins in the eyes of GOD. This teaching is a result of the evolutionary understanding of GOD from certain Christian theology. At various times in human history, many gods were worshipped throughout the civilizations as noted in many History Channel programs and DVDs. The relevant change should stem from the recognition of God’s words “whatever you do to the least of these, you do unto me.”

I recognize God as the universally Supreme, all-knowing existence. God of the Earth, the Stars, and the Universe regulated by the order of science and math constantly growing in the quest for balance (molecular and chemical). This recognition along with our current knowledge reveals the possibility of other existences in the universe. Extending further the thought of other existences (life beyond Earth - Heaven, etc.) allows the understanding of a vast, diverse universe with the ability to visit Earth and share advanced knowledge.

Societal economic development and prosperity tends to increase competition for resources and man-made systems are derived for allocation. This competitive process, unfortunately, can lead to the placement of value one over another based upon non-relevant factors. This historical competitive hierarchy creation extended ideologies to human relationships above the American ideals of equality, education, and ability.